This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------525248E763B0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--
[------------ Dental Globe, Inc. ----------]
[-------- http://www.dentalglobe.com ------]
[------------- (800) 475-8605 -------------]
[-- The Premier Internet Dental Resource --]
--------------525248E763B0
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path:
Received: from gatekeeper.ctron.com by gemini.adnc.com (SMI-8.6/SVR4 Mailer ADN 1/96)
id HAA09316; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 07:28:33 -0700
Received: (from news@localhost) by gatekeeper.ctron.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id KAA13748; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:26:32 -0400
Received: from stealth.ctron.com(134.141.5.107) by gatekeeper via smap (V1.3mjr)
id sma013735; Mon Oct 21 10:26:25 1996
Received: from express.ctron.com by stealth.ctron.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA01575; Mon, 21 Oct 96 10:22:39 EDT
Received: from rand (rand.ctron.com [134.141.67.73]) by express.ctron.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA20239; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:27:58 -0400
Sender: marcotte@ctron.com
Message-Id: <326BB3F9.2781@ctron.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 10:33:45 -0700
From: "Christopher C. Marcotte"
Organization: Cabletron Systems, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0b7Gold (X11; I; IRIX 5.3 IP22)
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Murphy , Eccentric Monthly ,
John Wiebe , Scot Sahai ,
toddl@ctron.com, mherbert@ctron.com, sharris@ctron.com,
manzi@ctron.com
Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Does this sound like anyone you know? (fwd)]]
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
ENGINEER IDENTIFICATION TEST
Engineering is so trendy these days that everybody wants to be one.
The
word "engineer" is greatly overused. If there's somebody in your life
who you think is trying to pass as an engineer, give him this test to
discern the truth.
ENGINEER IDENTIFICATION TEST
You walk into a room and notice that a picture is hanging crooked.
You...
A. Straighten it.
B. Ignore it.
C. Buy a CAD system and spend the next six months designing a
solar-powered, self-adjusting picture frame while often stating aloud
your
belief that the inventor of the nail was a total moron.
The correct answer is "C" but partial credit can be given to anybody
who
writes "It depends" in the margin of the test or simply blames the
whole
stupid thing on "Marketing."
SOCIAL SKILLS
Engineers have different objectives when it comes to social
interaction.
"Normal" people expect to accomplish several unrealistic things from
social interaction:
*Stimulating and thought-provoking conversation
*Important social contacts
*A feeling of connectedness with other humans
In contrast to "normal" people, engineers have rational objectives for
social interactions:
*Get it over with as soon as possible.
*Avoid getting invited to something unpleasant.
*Demonstrate mental superiority and mastery of all subjects.
FASCINATION WITH GADGETS
To the engineer, all matter in the universe can be placed into one of
two
categories:
(1) things that need to be fixed, and
(2) things that will need to be fixed after you've had a few minutes to
play with them.
Engineers like to solve problems. If there are no problems handily
available, they will create their own problems. Normal people don't
understand this concept; they believe that if it ain't broke, don't fix
it. Engineers believe that if it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough
features yet.
No engineer looks at a television remote control without wondering what
it would take to turn it into a stun gun. No engineer can take
a shower
without wondering if some sort of Teflon coating would make showering
unnecessary. To the engineer, the world is a toy box full of
sub-optimized and feature-poor toys.
FASHION AND APPEARANCE
Clothes are the lowest priority for an engineer, assuming the basic
thresholds for temperature and decency have been satisfied. If no
appendages are freezing or sticking together, and if no genitalia or
mammary glands are swinging around in plain view, then the objective of
clothing has been met. Anything else is a waste.
DATING AND SOCIAL LIFE
Dating is never easy for engineers. A normal person will employ
various
indirect and duplicitous methods to create a false impression of
attractiveness. Engineers are incapable of placing appearance above
function.
Fortunately, engineers have an ace in the hole. They are widely
recognized
as superior marriage material: intelligent, dependable, employed,
honest,
and handy around the house. While it's true that many normal people
would
prefer not to date an engineer, most normal people harbor an intense
desire to mate with them, thus producing engineerlike children who
will have high-paying jobs long before losing their virginity.
Male engineers reach their peak of sexual attractiveness later than
normal
men, becoming irresistible erotic dynamos in their mid thirties to late
forties. Just look at these examples of sexually irresistible men in
technical professions:
* Bill Gates.
* MacGyver.
* Etcetera.
HONESTY
Engineers are always honest in matters of technology and human
relationships. That's why it's a good idea to keep engineers away from
customers, romantic interests, and other people who can't handle the
truth.
Engineers sometimes bend the truth to avoid work. They say things that
sound like lies but technically are not because nobody could be
expected
to believe them. The complete list of engineer lies is listed below.
"I won't change anything without asking you first."
"I'll return your hard-to-find cable tomorrow."
"I have to have new equipment to do my job."
"I'm not jealous of your new computer."
FRUGALITY
Engineers are notoriously frugal. This is not because of cheapness or
mean spirit; it is simply because every spending situation is simply a
problem in optimization, that is, "How can I escape this situation
while
retaining the greatest amount of cash?"
POWERS OF CONCENTRATION
If there is one trait that best defines an engineer it is the ability
to
concentrate on one subject to the complete exclusion of everything else
in
the environment. This sometimes causes engineers to be pronounced dead
prematurely. Some funeral homes in high-tech areas have started
checking
resumes before processing the bodies. Anybody with a degree in
electrical
engineering or experience in computer programming is propped up in the
lounge for a few days just to see if he or she snaps out of it.
RISK
Engineers hate risk. They try to eliminate it whenever they can. This
is
understandable, given that when an engineer makes one little mistake
the
media will treat it like it's a big deal or something.
EXAMPLES OF BAD PRESS FOR ENGINEERS
* Hindenberg.
* Space Shuttle Challenger.
* SPANet(tm)
* Hubble space telescope.
* Apollo 13.
* Titanic.
* Ford Pinto.
* Corvair.
The risk/reward calculation for engineers looks something like this:
RISK: Public humiliation and the death of thousands of innocent
people.
REWARD: A certificate of appreciation in a handsome plastic frame.
Being practical people, engineers evaluate this balance of risks and
rewards and decide that risk is not a good thing. The best way to
avoid
risk is by advising that any activity is technically impossible for
reasons
that are
far too complicated to explain.
If that approach is not sufficient to halt the project, then the
engineer
will fall back to a second line of defense: "It's technically possible
but it will cost too much."
EGO
Ego-wise, two things are important to engineers:
* How smart they are.
* How many cool devices they own.
The fastest way to get an engineer to solve a problem is to declare
that
the problem is unsolvable. No engineer can walk away from an
unsolvable
problem until it's solved. No illness or distraction is sufficient to
get the engineer off the case. These types of challenges quickly
become
personal -- a battle between the engineer and the laws of nature.
Engineers will go without food and hygiene for days to solve a problem.
(Other times just because they forgot.) And when they succeed in
solving
the problem they will experience an ego rush that is better than sex --
and I'm including the kind of sex where other people are involved.
Nothing is more threatening to the engineer than the suggestion that
somebody has more technical skill. Normal people sometimes use that
knowledge as a lever to extract more work from the engineer. When an
engineer says that something can't be done (a code phrase that means
it's
not fun to do), some clever normal people have learned to glance at the
engineer with a look of compassion and pity and say something along
these
lines: "I'll ask Bob to figure it out. He knows how to solve
difficult
technical problems."
At that point it is a good idea for the normal person to not stand
between
the engineer and the problem. The engineer will set upon the problem
like
a starved Chihuahua on a pork chop.
--
Chris Marcotte
Spectrum QA
7-7772
--------------525248E763B0--